|
|
The Practice of Poetry
I've often said, as a joke, that I'm the opposite of a perfectionist, but
I'm not entirely sure what that means. I suppose it means that I am "committed to the process" of writing to the
extent that this is opposed to the final product.
1. Normally we practice in order to get better, but when someone
says they have a law practice, you aren't supposed to think that the partners are practicing for a final performance
of The Law. Our practice is what we do. Thus, two meanings split, two meanings that are set within a poetic
practice, which is a dialectic between the artist's experience and the artist's goal. Practice is a negotiation with
the actual to expand the range of the possible. That is, poetry is a practice that precedes its final cause in itself.
A
back and forth in place.
In poetry you have to be a beginner with the knowledge of the expert ("an improved infancy"):
you move from infancy to adulthood in the same instant and call that poetry.
You have to move back and forth.
"Reflective
practice is…a continuous process from a personal perspective, by considering critical incidents within your life's experiences." "Reflective
practice is simply creating a habit, structure, or routine around examining experience." —from
a pamphlet, "What is Reflective Practice?"
Hence, there is a back and forth between the givenness of life, the facts,
and our personal experience of them. There are actual things, things that have occurred, and we need to find our
place within them, but we need to do it reflectively; thus, our groping is our practice. We can't become a fact ourself
to ourself.
This is the essence of practice: an oscillation between the mastered and the unknown.
We can't
control the outcome but we can protect the process.
According to Miriam Nichols, "in a process poetics form unfolds
behind the poet as he moves through a poem or a life, rather than in or before her as an origin or a thesis to be explicated.
Only as the poem approaches its end--the end of the poet's life in the case of the life-long poem--does the form begin
to emerge and then only fully for others, rather than the one who has lived it to its end and will never see the whole
of it. Hence the readerly quality of process poetry (the writer reads her own writing), and the absence of devices that
distance or ironize; the poet is finding out as he goes along, as it were."
Yes, the outcome is sold out of our
hands.
Of course, this means that, in some respects, provisionality is in the service of an even more ambitious
greatness.
I find myself opposed to the heroism of modernity, to its finality, but not to its aspiration.
Of
course we make mistakes. Who we were yesterday is, and always will be, quite embarrassing. I'm still getting
better at everything I do. Another way of saying this is that I'd like to feel that I will always be getting better.
Until
you are older and more established (and this point keeps getting pushed further and further into the distance) it will
always seem like if you stopped now your work will have meant nothing, but if you continue there is always the possibility.
They
say, practice makes perfect and that means that that which you are practicing is not yet perfect. That's right.
"Viewed
most generally, a 'reflective equilibrium' is the end-point of a deliberative process in which we reflect on and revise
our beliefs about an area of inquiry, moral or non-moral. The method of reflective equilibrium consists in working
back and forth among our considered judgments (some say our "intuitions") about particular instances or cases, the principles
or rules that we believe govern them, and the theoretical considerations that we believe bear on accepting these considered
judgments, principles, or rules, revising any of these elements wherever necessary in order to achieve an acceptable
coherence among them. The method succeeds and we achieve reflective equilibrium when we arrive at an acceptable coherence
among these beliefs." —Norman Daniels "Reflective Equilibrium"
So we are not in equilibrium yet?
As
Michael Palmer writes in "Notes for Echo Lake 3," "And if each conversation has no end, then composition is a placing beside
or with and is endless, broken threads of cloud driven from the west by afternoon wind."
No, moving between water
and vapor, clouds, as we are moving, moving between, always not quite there yet.
2. What I want, as an artist,
is to keep being an artist. Certain events give us standing in this arena: publication, fame, gallery shows, sales.
But these are all external, they guarantee nothing.
They all only give us the standing necessary to proceed (a word
also encompassed by 'process').
We need standing in the court of art: of course, nothing will give it to us for
sure. John Berryman famously said to Merwin that if you need to know if a poem good or not, maybe you shouldn't be a writer.
There is no certainty, but we can offer it ourselves by knowing what we will do tomorrow: we will continue.
I
have what it takes to keep practicing. That's just what continuing might mean.
In an interview the poet Robert
Sheppard said, "Poetics exists for oneself and for others, to produce, to quote Rachel Blau DuPlessis, in the best definition:
'a permission to continue.'"
"I have never viewed poetics as 'a permission to continue writing." —Rachel
Blau DuPlessis, The Pink Guitar
In negation, what is said causes another to say the opposite and claim that's what
you said. It's not like when somebody mistakes your name they're all adamant. They don't insist that you have
another name. They give up. I wish more people gave up
when I said
The artist is practicing for the finale while completing it.
3. "You might write to us here.
Out week of honeymoon is over. Lord, it was lovely. But this—do I like this better?—I like it so
much. Don't tell anybody. This is only for the good to know. Write to us." —DH Lawrence to Mrs.
Hopkins
Practice is then a promise.
A promise always concerns the future, but in the case of the type of practice
that poetry is, the future is now and later. Some for now and some for later. It stretches the concept.
Practice
stretches us.
In Hume's famous essay "Of the Standard of Taste" he fittingly outlines how a standard of taste is
possible. He believes that the "true judge of the finer arts" possesses five attributes: "strong sense, united
to delicate sentiment, improved by practice, perfected by comparison, and cleared of all prejudice" (Paragraph 23).
These five attributes are each separately necessary and jointly sufficient for a person to become an ideal critic.
He then goes on to write that the agreement on aesthetic issues between critics with these attributes is "the true standard
of taste and beauty" (Paragraph 23).
If we, as artists, are also to be critics of the art we practice, our critical
faculties must be enabled to be improved by practice.
Thus, practice is philosophically grounded.
However, Schlegel
often separates poetry and philosophy more than Novalis does, as in "Poetry and philosophy are … different spheres. For
only try to combine the two and you will find yourself with nothing but religion" and "Where philosophy stops, poetry must
begin." And further, "Philosophy too is the result of two conflicting forces – of poetry and practice."
Katharsis
as the practice of emotions. Emotional practice. Aristotle is agreeing with Plato that poetry arouses the emotions of man
and that these emotions must be kept in check. However, Aristotle also believes that one of the best ways to control
one's emotions is to allow them to be purged by way of the motion of the tragic poem. Or as Richard Janko writes, Taking
tragedy as an example, the cathartic process works as follows. By representing pitiable, terrifying and other painful events,
tragedy arouses pity, terror and other painful emotions in the audience, for each according to his own emotional capacity,
and so stimulates these emotions as to relieve them by giving them moderate and harmless exercise, thereby bringing
the audience nearer to the mean in their emotional responses, and so nearer to virtue in their characters; and with
this relief comes pleasure. The process of katharsis 'trains' our emotional responses so that we may react appropriately
in pitiably or fearful situations. An example of this would be seeing a play about someone whose mother dies.
The experience of seeing that play, in some way, helps you with your emotions when your own mother dies. But if
this is true it means that morally there should be artistic representations of the emotions dealt with by marginalized
groups of people for if these don't exist those groups will be denied the benefits of katharsis.
4. HART CRANE: "Passage":
Where the cedar leaf divides the sky I heard the sea. In sapphire arenas of the
hills I was promised an improved infancy.
Sulking, sanctioning the sun, My memory I left in a ravine,- Casual
louse that tissues the buck-wheat, Aprons rocks, congregates pears In moonlit bushels And wakens alleys with a hidden
cough.
EXEGESIS OF PASSAGE: "describe the experience of the visionary voyage, promising 'an improved infancy' –
i.e., rebirth, a return to innocence. Memory described scornfully in the second stanza, is left behind." —Monroe
Kirklyndorf Spears, Hart Crane.
LIFTING IT TOWARDS US: "Hart Crane was promised an improved, not a perfected infancy,
yet what a peril it is to lose sight (of course I mean this literally) of the infant's perfect eye. Without innocence, experience
can only repeat itself." —Donald Revell, The Art of Attention.
The craft question: how do we get to our own
improved infancy, where we are beginners but with more skill? That is, as infants we are totally dependent on
a parent, but as poets we must become that parent: alpha and omega or our own lives, and if not lives, then art.
|
|
|